The Buddha it is said, wished to be represented by
the Bodhi-tree; not by image or symbol. At the Kalingabodhi Jataka
(J 4.228) Ananda wishes to establish a sacred or, the same, a hallowed
(cetiya) substitute for the Buddha by which people might make their offering
of wreaths and garlands. The Buddha asks Ananda how many kinds of hallows
there are. Ananda replies there are three kinds: 1) those of the
bodily relics; 2) those of association; 3) those prescribed (i.e.,symbolic).
The Buddha then rejects the first and the last, recognizing only association.
So what does association mean? The Buddha answers, Only a Mahabodhirukkha,
i.e., the Great Wisdom tree, that has been associated with a Buddha is
fit to be hallow (cetiya), whether the Buddha be still living, or thoroughly-unbound
(pari-nirvana) [from the temporal]. It is clear that this tree is
no ordinary tree. The Buddha has something else in mind.
Perhaps we might think of this hallow tree as the
procession of Bodhi illumination (since rukkha, meaning tree, also connotes
illumination). This procession would be like an illuminative branching
going in all directions. From another angle, the Mahabodhirukka,
in its emanation phase, is active, universal compassion (which is different
than human compassion). In this depiction, it is Bodhi illumination revealing
itself to its inchoate side, i.e., the sentient beings who are still living
under the spell of self-materialization, unable to awaken from the nightmare
of linear rebirth into corporeal bodies. Helping to grasp this point,
it is important to remember that in the Buddha legend, the Buddha, after
his enlightenment, showed true compassion by teaching beings how to overcome
rebirth. More than this, the Buddha understood that rebirth, by means
of desiring painful corporeality, was the fundamental cause of suffering.
We also need to consider the ascension phase with
regard to this tree (i.e., our wish to become enlightened). But before
we do, we need to consider the tree of natural life in which the primordial
Mind, being at first, inchoate (avijja), wrestles with its self-creations
of which it has no idea (sambodhi) that it is their lord and master.
Its growth ends, hopefully, in flowering (bodha) which is to say, its natural
growth ends in the beginning of its liberation from its conflicting self-creations.
This, of course, is the inception of the Bodhisattva path to Buddhahood.
It is the ascension phase; but one which is an inversion, that is, it goes
from the flower back down to the root. Thus, by an excruciating process
of trial and error, our flowered Mind (Bodhicitta) eventually must return
to its primordial root of the tree of natural life through remembrance.
In sum, working backwards from the flower to the branches then past the
trunk to the root, is properly speaking, the path of the Bodhisattva which
we earlier termed the ascension phase. It culminates in enlightenment
where the Bodhisattva sits at the root of the Mahabodhirukkha, i.e., the
great Bodhi illuminating tree.
At the base of the tree, the Bodhisattva (who is
awakened) begins to generate the illuminating tree (Mahabodhirukkha) which
is superessential compassion (the phase of emanation). It shines
downwards, like a sun, into the multiplex branches of phenomena (i.e.,
the Five Aggregates). As it were, the tree brings illumination into
the dark underworld of beings. By doing so, it breaks the spell of
matter which has a hold on the sentient beings, showing the most worthy
of beings this immortal light which ends matter’s rule. And so, another
cycle commences. Those beholding this divine tree of light, glowing
and flowering within their hearts, begin their careers as fledgling Bodhisattvas
who will one day, themselves, become Buddhas sitting at the base of the
Mahabodhirukkha only to repeat the salvific emanation cycle again.
To sum this up, we have essentially three trees.
The first is the tree of nature. The second is the tree of inverted
ascension which the Bodhisattva takes in order to get to the root or base
of the first tree. The third tree is the enlightenment tree, which like
the sun, radiates the salvific light through all branches unto the last.
On the issue of this salvific light, a few ideas need to be laid out lest
we trivialize the meaning of light in this context. This light of
which we are addressing, first of all, is deathless. So that by beholding
it one comes to understand that it is the power of animation which is the
immortal substance (S., amritadhatu). When one becomes a witness
to this light they then commence to renounce the kingdom of matter, for
renunciation means to turn to the source of all. Most importantly,
this light has an end. This end is the dynamic power of illumination,
which is a sheer productivity. This is the root (mula) of Buddhahood,
or the same, the stage of the non-reversing Bodhisattva which some scholars
hold begins with the eighth Bodhisattva bhumi (ground) of the ten bhumis
(Dashabhumi). It should be pointed out that saving sentient beings
is synonymous with illuminating others, or the same, awakening the sleeping
mind which has been bewitched by matter symbolized by Mara the Evil One,
with whom the Buddha fights while sitting at the base of the Mahabodhrukkha.